Re: [PATCH] securityfs

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:35PM -0500, serue@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Quoting Greg KH (greg@xxxxxxxxx):
> > think it could be made even smaller if you use the default read and
> > write file type functions in libfs (look at the debugfs wrappers of them
> > for u8, u16, etc, for examples of how to use them.)
> 
> The attached patch cleans up the securelevel code for the seclvl file.
> Is this a reasonable way to go about this?

No.

> Or is there a better way to do this?

Look at how debugfs uses the libfs code.  We should not need to add
these handlers to securityfs.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/