Re: [PATCH] [2/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12:300-reboot-handler-hook.patch

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:08, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 7/6/05, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff -ruNp 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-new/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
> > --- 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c       2005-06-20 11:46:50.000000000 +1000
> > +++ 301-proc-acpi-sleep-activate-hook.patch-new/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c       2005-07-04 23:14:18.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -68,6 +68,17 @@ acpi_system_write_sleep (
> >                 goto Done;
> >         }
> >         state = simple_strtoul(str, NULL, 0);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND2
> > +       /*
> > +        * I used to put this after the CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
> > +        * test, but people who compile in suspend2 usually want
> > +        * to use it instead of swsusp.   --NC
> > +        */
> > +       if (state == 4) {
> 
> enum for states instead of magics, please.

Changed to ACPI_STATE_S4. Thanks!

Nigel

-- 
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/