Re: [PATCH] [24/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12:601-kernel_power_power-header.patch

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 13:42, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> 
> > diff -ruNp 602-smp.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/smp.c 602-smp.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/smp.c
> > --- 602-smp.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/smp.c	1970-01-01 10:00:00.000000000 +1000
> > +++ 602-smp.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/smp.c	2005-07-04 23:14:19.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > +#include <linux/sched.h>
> > +
> > +void ensure_on_processor_zero(void)
> > +{
> > +	set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0));
> > +	BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void return_to_all_processors(void)
> > +{
> > +	set_cpus_allowed(current, CPU_MASK_ALL);
> > +}
> 
> Do we really need to wrap these?

Fair enough. If I remember rightly, it's just a result of the flux with
testing cpu hotplug, so I should certainly drop the wrappers.

Nigel
-- 
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/