Re: [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module

[James Morris]

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Tony Jones wrote:

> There just isn't enough content to justify a stacker specific filesystem IMHO.

It might be worth thinking about a more general securityfs as part of LSM,
to be used by stacker and LSM modules.  SELinux could use this instead of
managing its own selinuxfs.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/