Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] UML - skas0 - separate kerneladdress space on stock hosts

[Andrew Morton]

Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This patch implements something very close to skas mode for hosts
> > > which don't support skas - I'm calling this skas0.
> >
> > I note that this patch assumes that
> > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is applied.
>
> You're fixing the conflict anyway since it's little, correct?

Well I can fix the reject if we decide that
uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but
it seems that there's no need.

> However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables crash, 
> and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok.

OK..

Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch?  I have a "keep this in -mm"
sign next to it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/