Re: setitimer expire too early (Kernel 2.4)

[Marcelo Tosatti]

Hi Olivier,

On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 07:52:12PM +0200, Olivier Croquette wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>Linus, Andrew, do you consider this critical enough to be merged to 
> >>the v2.4 tree?
> >
> >
> >No.  I'd expect this would hurt more people than it would benefit.
> 
> 
> Probably.
> Does that mean that the kernel 2.4 will keep this bug for ever?

Probably, yes. I've never heard such complaints before your message.

The right way to do it seems something else BTW:

quoting Nish Aravamudan (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/29/240):

Your patch is the only way to guarantee no early timeouts, as far as I know.

Really, what you want is:

on adding timers, take the ceiling of the interval into which it could be added
on expiring timers, take the floor

This combination guarantees no timers go off early (and takes away
many of these corner cases). I do exactly this in my patch, btw.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/