Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

From: Hubert Chan
Date: Thu Jun 23 2005 - 20:18:10 EST

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:37:05 -0400, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxx> said:

> As someone who spends time debugging reiser3 issues, I've grown
> accustomed to the named assertions. They make discussing a particular
> assertion much more natural in conversation than file:line. It also
> makes difficult to reproduce assertions more trackable over time. The
> assertion number never changes, but the line number can with even the
> most trivial of patches.

How about something of the form "nikita-955(file:line)"? Or the
reverse: "file:line(nikita-955)". Would that keep everyone happy?

Hubert Chan <hubert@xxxxxxxxx> -
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at Encrypted e-mail preferred.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at