Re: Linux v2.6.12-rc6

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Erik Mouw wrote:
> 
> Well, it's nice to know which repos you pulled from for a particular
> release, that makes it easier to figure out what's wrong if/when
> something breaks.

Well, the thing is, you don't actually get a full list - you at best get a
_partial_ list of the merges I do. In fact, it's almost always a proper 
subset, with (wild wag) 10% of the merges never showing up.

If a repo has already merged with me on the far end, my merge will be just 
a "fast-forward to what they did", which won't show up as a separate 
commit.

Similarly, if somebody is on a different time-zone from me and just
happens to do his work while I'm sleeping, and I pull the tree first thing
in the morning, there won't be any overlapping development and again it's
just a fast-forward. So no merges at _all_ may be showing on either side
in that case.. 

This very much does happen, exactly because we have a "merge often" 

> Isn't the easy fix to put the long changelog information on a single
> line?

Sure. It's just a shell script that generates the message:

	merge_name=$(echo "$1" | sed 's:\.git/*$::')
	if [ "$2" ]
	then
	   merge_name="'$2' branch from
	
	        $merge_name"
	   merge_head="refs/heads/$2"
	fi

but the reason I do it on multiple lines is that that looks better in the 
long format, I think.

But maybe the short format is the one I should prioritize, since that's
the one that also shows up in the summary line for the graphical tools
(webgit and gitk).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/