Re: Stable 2.6.x.y kernel series...

[Nick Craig-Wood]

In linux.kernel, you wrote:
>  On Gwe, 2005-06-03 at 23:43, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Just wanted to say in public that I think the stable 2.6.x.y kernel 
> > series is working out quite well.  Kudos to the stable@xxxxxxxxxx team 
> > for a job well done.
> 
>  Ditto, and its been conservative enough that not only does it stay
>  pretty stable (one partition slip-up so far is very good indeed) its
>  small enough that most of the add on patches people use aren't breaking
>  against it either.

Hearty agreement from me.

The next hurdle for 2.6.11-stable is to make sure that everything that
went into it goes into 2.6.12.  Is there a procedure for that?

-- 
Nick Craig-Wood <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/