Re: [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 02/09] blk: make scsi use -EOPNOTSUPPinstead of -EIO on ILLEGAL_REQUEST

[Tejun Heo]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > 02_blk_scsi_eopnotsupp.patch
> >
> >     Use -EOPNOTSUPP instead of -EIO on ILLEGAL_REQUEST.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >  scsi_lib.c |    3 ++-
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: blk-fixes/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- blk-fixes.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c    2005-06-05 
> > 14:53:32.000000000 +0900
> > +++ blk-fixes/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c    2005-06-05 14:53:33.000000000 
> > +0900
> > @@ -849,7 +849,8 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd
> >                  scsi_requeue_command(q, cmd);
> >                  result = 0;
> >              } else {
> > -                cmd = scsi_end_request(cmd, 0, this_count, 1);
> > +                cmd = scsi_end_request(cmd, -EOPNOTSUPP,
> > +                               this_count, 1);
>
>
> This looks like a change from zero to EOPNOTSUPP, but your description 
> says its a change from EIO to EOPNOTSUPP.
>
>     Jeff

 Hello, Jeff.

 I just found it confusing to write changing 0 to -EOPNOTSUPP when 0 
actually means -EIO (uptodate).  I'll write in more detailed way next time.

 Thank you. :-)

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/