Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 07:51 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:

> __plist_del was a good fix. I attached a patch on "Plist cleanup on RT" to
> lkml with what was acceptable to me. A good 60% of Thomas's changes are
> unacceptable to me.

Would you be so kind to explain that a bit ? Your patch contains _all_
my proposed changes except the additional plist_first_entry macro and
the comment cleanup.

So what are the 60% which are unacceptable. Comments ? I'm amused.

tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/