Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 17:45:45 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic."
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] cpm_uart: Route SCC2 pins for the STx GP3 board"
In reply to: Martin Schwidefsky: "[patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks."
Next in thread: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks.

Which of these patches are considered to be 2.6.12 material?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch 6/11] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic."
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] cpm_uart: Route SCC2 pins for the STx GP3 board"
In reply to: Martin Schwidefsky: "[patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks."
Next in thread: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [patch 1/11] s390: cio max channels checks."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]