RE: 2.6.12-rc5 is broken in nvidia Ck804 Opteron MB/with dual cor e dual way

From: YhLu
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 13:57:14 EST


So core1 is not the sibling of core0?

YH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:52 AM
> To: YhLu
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc5 is broken in nvidia Ck804 Opteron
> MB/with dual cor e dual way
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:26:00PM -0700, YhLu wrote:
> > Brought up 4 CPUs
> > CPU 0, cpu_sibling_map[0]= 1
> > CPU 0, cpu_core_map[0]= 3
> > CPU 1, cpu_sibling_map[1]= 2
> > CPU 1, cpu_core_map[1]= 3
> > CPU 2, cpu_sibling_map[2]= 4
> > CPU 2, cpu_core_map[2]= c
> > CPU 3, cpu_sibling_map[3]= 8
> > CPU 3, cpu_core_map[3]= c
> > are the cpu_sibling_map[] right?
>
> Yes it is correct. A CPU is always a sibling of itself.
>
> -Andi
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/