Re: [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code

[Stefan Seyfried]

Pavel Machek wrote:

> Anyway, it should not be arch-dependend. We need one good mechanism of
> notifying userland, not one per architecture.

Yes.

>> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events,
>> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that
>> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as
>> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly.
> 
> Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too?

No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of
notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep
it alive.
-- 
Stefan Seyfried
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices        |              "Any ideas, John?"
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg  | "Well, surrounding them's out."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/