Re: pci-irq VIA82C586 problem on IBM 4694-205 kernel version 2.4.29

From: Salomon, Frank
Date: Thu May 19 2005 - 02:47:54 EST


Hi Marcelo,

sorry, I don't know why my solution is working correctly. I compared the sources of the kernel version 2.4.18 with the version 2.4.29. Don send me a very interesting link (http://lwn.net/Articles/38879/).
I try to switch back to the function from version 2.4.18 and it is working correctly too. But I only switch back for the VIA 82C586 which is included in the IBM 4694-205 and in the 4694-245.


Best regards, Frank





Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Hi Frank,

On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Salomon, Frank wrote:

Hi All,

With kernel version 2.4.18 I have no problem to run pcnet32.o on the IBM 4694-205. Now I switch to kernel version 2.4.29. insmod crc32 : ok , insmod mii : ok , insmod pcnet32 : ok.

But if I run ifconfig (ifup) the system fries. Can't toggle the numlock led. I find out that the system generates permanently interrupts from the pcnet32 chip after calling request_irq (irq=9).

lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C585VP [Apollo VP1/VPX] (rev 25)
00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586/A/B PCI-to-ISA [Apollo VP] (rev 47)
00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586/B/686A/B PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 02)
00:07.3 Non-VGA unclassified device: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586B ACPI (rev 10)
00:0a.0 VGA compatible controller: Cirrus Logic GD 5446
00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE] (rev 43)


A possible solution could be (only tested on IBM 4694-205 and I don't have other systems with VIA Tech.):


Why the current get/set methods for via pirq do not work as expected? /*
* The VIA pirq rules are nibble-based, like ALI,
* but without the ugly irq number munging.
* However, PIRQD is in the upper instead of lower nibble.
*/
static int pirq_via_get(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq)
{
return read_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirq == 4 ? 5 : pirq);
}
static int pirq_via_set(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq, int irq)
{
write_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirq == 4 ? 5 : pirq, irq);
return 1;
}

Only difference is that your change ignores the "pirq" value... Is that the problem?



diff -u 2.4.29_orig/arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c 2.4.29/arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c
--- 2.4.29_orig/arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c Wed Jan 19 15:09:25 2005
+++ 2.4.29/arch/i386/kernel/pci-irq.c Tue May 17 15:55:28 2005
@@ -214,6 +214,17 @@
return 1;
}

+static int pirq_via_586_get(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq)
+{
+ return read_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirq);
+}
+static int pirq_via_586_set(struct pci_dev *router, struct pci_dev *dev, int pirq, int irq)
+{
+ write_config_nybble(router, 0x55, pirq, irq);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+
/*
* ITE 8330G pirq rules are nibble-based
* FIXME: pirqmap may be { 1, 0, 3, 2 },
@@ -649,6 +660,10 @@
switch(device)
{
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_0:
+ r->name = "VIA";
+ r->get = pirq_via_586_get;
+ r->set = pirq_via_586_set;
+ return 1;
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C596:
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C686:
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8231:


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html