socket file permissions and ownership

From: Michael Tokarev
Date: Mon May 16 2005 - 01:44:32 EST


Unlike some other *nix flavours, linux honors normal
AF_LOCAL socket file permissions and ownership -- eg,
you can't connect to a socket if file permissions indicate
you can't read/write the file.

But at the same time, linux ignores *changes* in said
permissions/ownership. The code:

int sock;
struct sockaddr_un sun;

sock = socket(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
unlink(sun.sun_path);
bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&sun, sizeof(sun));

fchmod(sock, 0660);
fchown(sock, 10, 20);

-- in this fragment (initialisation omitted for brevity),
fchown() and fchmod() calls succeed but does exactly nothing,
ie, no permission and ownership change occurs.

"Plain" chmod()/chown() (when referring to the file by name,
not by filedescriptor) works.

I was thinking about actually using the linux feature (linux
checking socket permissions), but it isn't quite possible to
do in a safe way. That is, I want to be able to create a socket
with given permissions and ownership from within a root-owned
process in a directory not writable by the owner of the socket
to be created. I can work around fchmod() by altering umask()
prior to bind() call. But for owner... Possible scenarios:

fchown(sock, s_owner, s_group) -- gets ignored by linux

seteuid(s_owner) before bind() -- s_owner does not have
permissions to create file(s) in the given directory

chown(sun.sun_path, s_owner, s_group) -- unsafe from
security point of view, if parent directory isn't owned
by root.

I know no other way to set ownership. And all the above 3
does not work.

So the obvious question: what should linux do, stop honoring
socket permissions and continue ignoring fch*() calls, or
continue using permissions AND implement fch*() calls?
Current situation is.. wrong. IMHO.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/