Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm1, build results compared to 2.6.12-rc3-mm3

[Jan Dittmer]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc4/2.6.12-rc4-mm1/


Comparing 2.6.12-rc3-mm3 to 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 (defconfig)

- sparc64: broke
    CC      arch/sparc64/kernel/signal32.o
    CC      arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.o
    CC      arch/sparc64/kernel/binfmt_elf32.o
    CC      arch/sparc64/kernel/module.o
    CC      arch/sparc64/kernel/kprobes.o
  In file included from /usr/src/ctest/mm/kernel/arch/sparc64/kernel/kprobes.c:8:
  /usr/src/ctest/mm/kernel/include/linux/kprobes.h:122: error: parse error before "spinlock_t"
  /usr/src/ctest/mm/kernel/include/linux/kprobes.h:123: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
  make[2]: *** [arch/sparc64/kernel/kprobes.o] Error 1
  make[1]: *** [arch/sparc64/kernel] Error 2
  make: *** [_all] Error 2
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3653

- arm: fixed
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3634

- arm26: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3635

- cris: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3636

- frv: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3637

- h8300: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3638

- ia64: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3640

- m32r: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3641

- m68k: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3642

- m68knommu: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3644

- parisc: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3646

- s390: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3649

- sh: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3650

- sh64: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3651

- v850: still broken
  Details: http://l4x.org/k/?d=3655

Summary: 8 ok, 14 failed

-- 
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/