Re: [PATCH] Software suspend and recalc sigpending bug fix

[Pavel Machek]

On Ät 12-05-05 10:43:51, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> >>This patch fixes recalc_sigpending() to work correctly
> >>with tasks which are being freezed. The problem is that
> >>freeze_processes() sets PF_FREEZE and TIF_SIGPENDING
> >>flags on tasks, but recalc_sigpending() called from
> >>e.g. sys_rt_sigtimedwait or any other kernel place
> >>will clear TIF_SIGPENDING due to no pending signals queued
> >>and the tasks won't be freezed until it recieves a real signal
> >>or freezed_processes() fail due to timeout.
> >>
> >>Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxx>
> >>Signed-Off-By: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >This should fix our problems with mysqld, right? Yes, patch looks good
> >(modulo missing whitespace around &)). I'll apply it to my tree. (Or
> >andrew, if you prefer, just take it...
> 
> Another cleanup idea in swsusp: it would be nice if all such checks for 
> PF_FREEZE were wrapped in inline function 
> is_task_freezing()/any_thing_else, to make freeze code disappear when 
> CONFIG_PM/CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is off...

S3 case needs this, too. Nicer solution would be to just define
PF_FREEZE to 0 when it is not needed; but as most hooks are hidden in
try_to_freeze(), anyway, I do not think this is worth it.
								Pavel
-- 
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/