Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold?

From: Dave Jones
Date: Tue May 10 2005 - 20:34:50 EST


On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:57:52AM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
> Jan De Luyck a écrit :
> >Hello lists,
> >
> >(please cc me from cpufreq list)
> >
> >I've since yesterday started using the ondemand governor. Seems to work
> >fine, tho I can't seem to find a reason why it keeps scaling my processor
> >speed upwards tho the processor use never exceeds 30% (been watching top
> >-d 1).
> :
> :
> >Any hints?
> You can try the three attached patches in the order :
> ondemand-cleanup-factorise-idle-measurement-2.6.11.patch
> ondemand-save-idle-up-for-all-cpu-2.6.11.patch
> ondemand-automatic-downscaling-2.6.11-accepted.patch
>
> They are available on the cpufreq list but as it's difficult to access
> it I'm sending them again, all together. These are the last things that
> Venki and I have been working on. It should solve your problem
> (actually, only the last patch, but it depends on the two previous
> patches). Please, let me know if it works.
>
> BTW, DaveJ, Dominik, I couldn't find them in the daily-snapshot
> available at codemonkey.org.uk. Should I worry, or is it just due to
> some latency between your private trees and the public one?

I'm preparing the first cpufreq->linus sync right now.
Can you write up some descriptions & signed-off-by: lines for
these three please ?

Thanks,
Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/