Re: setitimer timer expires too early

From: Olivier Croquette
Date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 10:35:00 EST

Nish Aravamudan wrote:

Perhaps not discussed before, but definitely a known issue. Check out
sys_nanosleep(), which adds an extra jiffy to the delay if there is
going to be one. My patch, which uses human-time (or at least more so
than currently), should not have issues like this.

What would be then the most precise and reliable delaying possibility in the present kernel?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at