Re: [PATCH 1a/7] dlm: core locking

From: Daniel Phillips
Date: Fri Apr 29 2005 - 19:53:21 EST

On Friday 29 April 2005 17:52, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> * Without LKM_LOCAL:
> [root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-
> real 0m39.699s
> user 0m3.644s
> sys 0m8.076s
> * With LKM_LOCAL
> [root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-
> real 0m22.076s
> user 0m3.869s
> sys 0m7.234s
> So yes, I'd say it's worth a significant amount of performance to us :)

To be precise, LKM_LOCAL saves you 44%, and even without LKM_LOCAL you turn in
a respectable number. Could you please provide your node, shared disk and
network specs?

Because I am greedy, I would like to have seen the Ext3 number, too. And oh
yes, the Ext2 number!


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at