Re: preempt-count oddities - still looking for comments :)

From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:49:16 EST

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Robert Love wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 19:31 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Replying to myself here since the initial mail got no response. Here's
> > hoping that it showing up on the list again draws some comments :-)
> I didn't think it was that big of a deal. ;-)
It's not really that big of a deal. I was just currious if I'd gotten it
right since I spend a good deal of time digging for possible reasons for
the differences (and finding none). :-)

> It seems the right approach. Personally, I would of made the type an
> s32, since fixed-sizes seems to be sensible in the thread_info
> structure, but an int is the same thing. Cool with me.
I'll update the patch(es) then and use __s32 in the structure and s32

> Acked-by: Robert Love <rml@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Robert Love

Jesper Juhl

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at