[PATCH] Don't use commit-id in building

From: Daniel Barkalow
Date: Tue Apr 26 2005 - 01:04:54 EST

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Al Viro wrote:

> > > So, it still complains about commit-id
> >
> > In this case, it would complain about .git/HEAD even if it found
> > commit-id. The right solution is probably to suppress that part if there's
> > no .git/HEAD.
> The right thing is to stop assuming that everyone has . in their $PATH,
> to start with...

Does anyone have . in their $PATH? I've only used the commit-id that I
installed previously. Since the tarball doesn't have a .git directory, the
only way you end up building cogito from a directory with a repository is
by using an earlier cogito or something of the sort, in which case, you
probably have the program.

In any case, commit-id isn't actually necessary for this operation.

We don't necessarily have commit-id available when building. Furthermore,
we don't necessarily have a repository. Just put in .git/HEAD if it
exists; otherwise, it's a base distribution.

Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Index: Makefile
--- f262000f302b749e485f5eb971e6aabefbb85680/Makefile (mode:100644 sha1:4f01bbbbb3fd0e53e9ce968f167b6dae68fcfa92)
+++ uncommitted/Makefile (mode:100644)
@@ -87,11 +87,13 @@
http-pull: LIBS += -lcurl

-cg-version: $(VERSION)
+cg-version: $(VERSION) .git/HEAD
@echo Generating cg-version...
@rm -f $@
@echo "#!/bin/sh" > $@
- @PATH=.:$(PATH) echo "echo \"$(shell cat $(VERSION)) ($(shell commit-id))\"" >> $@
+ @echo -n "echo \"$(shell cat $(VERSION))" >> $@
+ @if [ -r .git/HEAD ]; then echo -n " ($(shell cat .git/HEAD))" >> $@; fi
+ @echo "\"" >> $@
@chmod +x $@


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/