Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks

From: Daniel Phillips
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 20:52:07 EST

On Monday 25 April 2005 20:41, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Despite the above, it compares pretty well to git in speed and is
> quite a bit better in terms of storage space. By reducing the zlib
> compression level, it could probably win across the board.

Hi Matt,

Congratulations on an impressive demo! How about actually checking the
compression vs wall clock theory? And I probably don't have to mention


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at