Re: Kernel SCM saga..

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 16:51 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Linus,
> 
> > That "individual patches" is one of the keywords, btw. One thing that BK 
> > has been extremely good at, and that a lot of people have come to like 
> > even when they didn't use BK, is how we've been maintaining a much finer- 
> > granularity view of changes. That isn't going to go away. 
> 
> Are you happy with processing patches + descriptions, one per mail?
> Do you have it automated to the point where processing emailed patches
> involves little more overhead than doing a bk pull?  If so, then your
> mailbox (or patch queue) becomes a natural serialization point for the
> changes, and the need for a tool that can handle a complex graph of
> changes is much reduced.

alternatively you could send an mbox with your series in... that has a
natural sequence in it ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/