Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

[Jeff Garzik]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:12:22AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Let's try with the 2.6.x.y numbering scheme, it's simple, and maybe it 
> > ends up being sufficient. I just wanted to bring up the point that I don't 
> > think the sucker tree _has_ to be seen as a 2.6.x.y tree at all.
>
>
> Fair enough, I'll stick with 2.6.x.y, as I think it's a good
> representation of what people expect.  If people start objecting, I'm
> always open for change.


So far, 2.6.11.1 was what I was hoping, and expecting, it would be.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/