Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0)

[David S. Miller]

On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 19:50:39 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / $B5HF#1QL@(B <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:46:43 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > If we wanted to preserve the split device semantics, then we
> > can create a local GC list in IPv6 so that it can search based
> > on rt6i_idev as well as the other keys.  Alternatively we can
> > remove the dst->dev == dev check in dst_dev_event and dst_ifdown
> > and move that test down to the individual ifdown functions.
> 
> Yes, IPv6 needs "split device" semantics
> (for per-device statistics such as Ip6InDelivers etc),
> and I like later solution.

Ok.  I never read whether ipv6, like ipv4, is specified to support
a model of host based ownership of addresses.  Does anyone know?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/