Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2 25/29] ide: convert REQ_DRIVE_CMD to REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Feb 03 2005 - 21:24:50 EST


Hello,

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:15:59 +0900, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

25_ide_taskfile_cmd.patch

All in-kernel REQ_DRIVE_CMD users except for ide_cmd_ioctl()
converted to use REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Index: linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-ide-export.orig/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2005-02-02 10:28:06.527986413 +0900
+++ linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2005-02-02 10:28:07.204876587 +0900
@@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ static int set_multcount(ide_drive_t *dr
if (drive->special.b.set_multmode)
return -EBUSY;
ide_init_drive_cmd (&rq);
- rq.flags = REQ_DRIVE_CMD;
+ rq.flags = REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE;


Please instead fix ide_init_drive_cmd() to set REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE
and add set REQ_DRIVE_CMD only in ide_cmd_ioctl().


This is done in patch #28. If you don't like the ordering of the patches, I can change the orders but I don't think that improves anything. This order is as good as the other order.


drive->mult_req = arg;
drive->special.b.set_multmode = 1;
(void) ide_do_drive_cmd (drive, &rq, ide_wait);
Index: linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide.c
===================================================================
--- linux-ide-export.orig/drivers/ide/ide.c 2005-02-02 10:27:14.652402828 +0900
+++ linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide.c 2005-02-02 10:28:07.205876425 +0900
@@ -1255,6 +1255,7 @@ static int set_pio_mode (ide_drive_t *dr
if (drive->special.b.set_tune)
return -EBUSY;
ide_init_drive_cmd(&rq);
+ rq.flags = REQ_DRIVE_TASKFILE;
drive->tune_req = (u8) arg;
drive->special.b.set_tune = 1;
(void) ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, &rq, ide_wait);

Thanks.

--
tejun

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/