Re: [patch libata-dev-2.6 1/1] libata: sync SMART ioctls with ATA pass thru spec (T10/04-262r7)

[Jens Axboe]

On Wed, Feb 02 2005, John W. Linville wrote:
> Update libata's SMART-related ioctl handlers to match the current
> ATA command pass-through specification (T10/04-262r7).  Also change
> related SCSI op-code definition to match current spec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Contact w/ spec author (Curtis Stevens @ Western Digital) indicates
> that while a revision 8 of the spec is expected, that it is really
> only a re-formatting of the text to match T10 requirements.  According
> to Stevens, revision 8 is expected to be the last version of the spec.
> 
>  drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c |    6 ++++--
>  include/scsi/scsi.h        |    6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> --- sata-smart-2.6/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c.orig	2005-02-01 16:24:01.687622085 -0500
> +++ sata-smart-2.6/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c	2005-02-01 16:49:18.213876086 -0500
> @@ -109,14 +109,16 @@ int ata_cmd_ioctl(struct scsi_device *sc
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  		scsi_cmd[1]  = (4 << 1); /* PIO Data-in */
> +		scsi_cmd[2]  = 0x0e;     /* no off.line or cc, read from dev,
> +		                            block count in sector count field */
>  		sreq->sr_data_direction = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
>  	} else {
>  		scsi_cmd[1]  = (3 << 1); /* Non-data */
> +		/* scsi_cmd[2] is already 0 -- no off.line, cc, or data xfer */
>  		sreq->sr_data_direction = DMA_NONE;
>  	}
>  
>  	scsi_cmd[0] = ATA_16;
> -	scsi_cmd[2] = 0x1f;     /* no off.line or cc, yes all registers */
>  
>  	scsi_cmd[4] = args[2];
>  	if (args[0] == WIN_SMART) { /* hack -- ide driver does this too... */
> @@ -179,7 +181,7 @@ int ata_task_ioctl(struct scsi_device *s
>  	memset(scsi_cmd, 0, sizeof(scsi_cmd));
>  	scsi_cmd[0]  = ATA_16;
>  	scsi_cmd[1]  = (3 << 1); /* Non-data */
> -	scsi_cmd[2]  = 0x1f;     /* no off.line or cc, yes all registers */
> +	/* scsi_cmd[2] is already 0 -- no off.line, cc, or data xfer */
>  	scsi_cmd[4]  = args[1];
>  	scsi_cmd[6]  = args[2];
>  	scsi_cmd[8]  = args[3];
> --- sata-smart-2.6/include/scsi/scsi.h.orig	2005-02-01 16:22:12.390234346 -0500
> +++ sata-smart-2.6/include/scsi/scsi.h	2005-02-01 16:23:02.828491161 -0500
> @@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ extern const char *const scsi_device_typ
>  /* values for service action in */
>  #define	SAI_READ_CAPACITY_16  0x10
>  
> -/* Temporary values for T10/04-262 until official values are allocated */
> -#define	ATA_16		      0x85	/* 16-byte pass-thru [0x85 == unused]*/
> -#define	ATA_12		      0xb3	/* 12-byte pass-thru [0xb3 == obsolete set limits command] */
> +/* Values for T10/04-262r7 */
> +#define	ATA_16		      0x85	/* 16-byte pass-thru */
> +#define	ATA_12		      0xa1	/* 12-byte pass-thru */

Ehh are you sure that is correct? 0xa1 is the BLANK command, I would
hate to think there would be a collision like that.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/