2.6.11-rc2 complains badly aboud badness in local_bh_enable
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun Jan 23 2005 - 07:02:26 EST
Hi!
-rc1 worked fine here. -rc2 complains a lot:
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [local_bh_enable+137/144] local_bh_enable+0x89/0x90
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ppp_start_xmit+206/560] ppp_start_xmit+0xce/0x230
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [qdisc_restart+107/368] qdisc_restart+0x6b/0x170
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ip_confirm+77/96] ip_confirm+0x4d/0x60
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [dev_queue_xmit+526/688] dev_queue_xmit+0x20e/0x2b0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ip_finish_output2+220/432] ip_finish_output2+0xdc/0x1b0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ip_finish_output2+0/432] ip_finish_output2+0x0/0x1b0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [nf_hook_slow+225/272] nf_hook_slow+0xe1/0x110
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ip_finish_output2+0/432] ip_finish_output2+0x0/0x1b0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [dst_output+0/32] dst_output+0x0/0x20
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ip_finish_output+494/512] ip_finish_output+0x1ee/0x200
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ip_finish_output2+0/432] ip_finish_output2+0x0/0x1b0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [dst_output+0/32] dst_output+0x0/0x20
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [dst_output+11/32] dst_output+0xb/0x20
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [nf_hook_slow+225/272] nf_hook_slow+0xe1/0x110
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [dst_output+0/32] dst_output+0x0/0x20
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [ip_push_pending_frames+996/1088] ip_push_pending_frames+0x3e4/0x440
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [dst_output+0/32] dst_output+0x0/0x20
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [udp_push_pending_frames+361/672] udp_push_pending_frames+0x169/0x2a0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [udp_sendmsg+841/1728] udp_sendmsg+0x349/0x6c0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [inet_sendmsg+74/112] inet_sendmsg+0x4a/0x70
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [sock_sendmsg+190/224] sock_sendmsg+0xbe/0xe0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [prep_new_page+85/96] prep_new_page+0x55/0x60
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [buffered_rmqueue+204/496] buffered_rmqueue+0xcc/0x1f0
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [prep_new_page+85/96] prep_new_page+0x55/0x60
Jan 23 12:59:50 amd kernel: [buffered_rmqueue+204/496] buffered_rmqueue+0xcc/0x1f0
Jan 23 12:59:51 amd kernel: [anon_vma_prepare+153/240] anon_vma_prepare+0x99/0xf0
Jan 23 12:59:51 amd kernel: [autoremove_wake_function+0/80] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
Jan 23 12:59:51 amd kernel: [sys_sendto+192/224] sys_sendto+0xc0/0xe0
Jan 23 12:59:51 amd kernel: [convert_fxsr_from_user+21/224] convert_fxsr_from_user+0x15/0xe0
Jan 23 12:59:51 amd kernel: [sys_socketcall+389/592] sys_socketcall+0x185/0x250
Jan 23 12:59:51 amd kernel: [do_page_fault+0/1378] do_page_fault+0x0/0x562
Jan 23 12:59:51 amd kernel: [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
I probably provoke it with transmitting data over cellphone over bluetooth?
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/