Re: slab.c use of __get_user and sparse

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Sat Jan 15 2005 - 17:10:56 EST


> Based on the comment it is understood that suddenly this pointer points
> to userspace, because the module got unloaded.
> I wonder why we can rely on the same address now the module got unloaded -
> we may risk this virtual address is taken over by someone else?

The address is not user space; you would be lying.

Perhaps it's best to get rid of the hack completely. Turn kmem_cache_t->name
into an array and copy the name instead of storing the pointer, then
it wouldn't be needed at all.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/