Re: [PATCH] PPC64 had _raw_read_trylock already

[Ingo Molnar]

* Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo presumably didn't notice that ppc64 already had a functional
> _raw_read_trylock when he added the #define to use the generic
> version.  This just removes the #define so we use the ppc64-specific
> version again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>

yeah - sorry.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/