Re: Ethernet driver link state propagation to ip stack

[Amir Guindehi]

Hi,

> > My question is:  Does the kernel handle the interface state/routing 
> > tables modifications due to link changing automatically
>
> Not completely.
>
> The biggest problem is that kernel does not remove its "connected" or 
> "subnet" route while link is down. This means that even though kernel 
> knows link is down, it will still try route packets out that interface.

I can confirm this.

> > or is there some external daemon required to do that. Any links are 
> > greatly appreciated.

Try the shell script below. It works for me (tm).

> There is "Netplug" - part of the net-tools package (On fedora core 3 at 
> least). You can use it to 'ip link set dev .... down' when carrier is 
> removed. However, you wont get notified of carrier being inserted back - 
> I dont know whether that holds true generally, or whether its an e1000 
> bug. So it's one-shot.
>
> We're looking at adding support to the 'zebra' daemon in Quagga to 
> remove connected routes while link is down and add them back when 
> link-up again, and hence deal with this properly. Amir is very 
> interested in this..

Yes, I am. And I found out the following. If I add the following 
one-liner shell script daemon, I get it all working:

while /bin/true; do echo "Check of eth5 ..."; A=`ethtool eth5 | grep 
'Link detected'`; if [ "$A" != "$O" ] ; then C=`echo "$A" | grep 'yes'`; 
if [ -n "$C" ] ; then echo "Adding route";  route add -net 5.5.7.0 
netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth5; else echo "Removing route"; route del 
-net 5.5.7.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth5; fi; O="$A"; fi; sleep 1; done

[I have to mention that eth5 is the interface where I pull and reinsert 
the cable]

As you can see I simply try to remove and re-add the connected route 
from user space. The above shell script works for me, and i can pull and 
re-insert my network cable as often as I want while still being able to 
reach the network on eth5 over different routes (received via ospf, I 
run Quagga) while the cable is pulled out and over the local interface 
while the cable is back in.

> /me grumbles about why oh why the "make kernel add connected routes"
>   feature was *ever* added in 2.3 in the first place (cause now
>   userspace has "forgotten" how to manage them, so we cant simply undo
>   this brain-damage[1] without breaking networking for everyone, sigh)

True.

I'm /not/ able to recreate the route as it was before my 'route del' the 
recreated route looks different from the route I remove at first (the 
connected one). I'm nor able to recreate the 'src xxx' flags and 
neighter is it a 'proto kernel' route ;)

So, in my eyes we need:
- A way to create connected routes from user space
or
- A kernel which removes the connected route on link loss and recreates 
it later when the link gets connected again.

Regards
- Amir
--
Amir Guindehi, nospam.amir@xxxxxxxxxxx
DataCore GmbH, Witikonerstrasse 289, 8053 Zurich, Switzerland

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/