Re: thoughts on kernel security issues

[Chris Wright]

* Hubert Tonneau (hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Basically, you are currently leaving non distribution related users alone in the
> cold and this is really really bad for the confidence we have in Linux,
> so please publish a 2.6.10.1 with the short term solution to fix the hole.
> Of course this does not prevent to publish 2.6.10.2 when you found a better
> solution, or use a different fix in 2.6.11 since they are not based on 2.6.10.1

I agree (it was part of my original mail), and would like to remedy this.
For now, you can pick up fixes from -ac tree.

> Regards,
> Hubert Tonneau
> 
> 
> PS: I believe that it would also be a very good idea, since Linux is now
> expected to be a mature organisation, to automatically publish 2.6.x.y new holes
> only fix patch for each stable kernel that has been released less than a year ago.
> This would enable smoother upgrade of highly important production servers.

Not sure about that (it's quite some work), but at least the _current_
stable release version.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/