[UPDATE PATCH] drivers/dmapool: use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE

[Nishanth Aravamudan]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:47:03PM +0100, Domen Puncer wrote:
> Patchset of 171 patches is at http://coderock.org/kj/2.6.10-bk13-kj/
> 
> Quick patch summary: about 30 new, 30 merged, 30 dropped.
> Seems like most external trees are merged in -linus, so i'll start
> (re)sending old patches.

<snip>

> msleep_interruptible-drivers_base_dmapool.patch

Please replace with the following patch. msleep_interruptible() is not
appropriate for this delay, as the waitqueue events will be missed.
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE should be used instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, though, as
signals are not checked for.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>


--- 2.6.10-v/drivers/base/dmapool.c	2004-12-24 13:35:28.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.10/drivers/base/dmapool.c	2005-01-10 12:05:08.000000000 -0800
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ restart:
 		if (mem_flags & __GFP_WAIT) {
 			DECLARE_WAITQUEUE (wait, current);
 
-			current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
+			set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 			add_wait_queue (&pool->waitq, &wait);
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore (&pool->lock, flags);
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/