Re: [PATCH] fix double sync_page_range() in generic_file_aio_write()

From: Suparna Bhattacharya
Date: Fri Jan 07 2005 - 02:03:49 EST



Sorry I missed this one - Thanks for spotting it !

Regards
Suparna

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 05:39:15PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> generic_file_aio_write():
> generic_file_aio_write_nolock():
> if (SYNC) sync_page_range_nolock();
> if (SYNC) sync_page_range();
>
> I think that generic_file_aio_write() should use
> __generic_file_aio_write_nolock() instead.
>
> Oleg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --- 2.6.10/mm/filemap.c~ 2004-11-15 17:12:21.000000000 +0300
> +++ 2.6.10/mm/filemap.c 2005-01-04 20:20:42.068803912 +0300
> @@ -2149,7 +2149,7 @@ ssize_t generic_file_aio_write(struct ki
> BUG_ON(iocb->ki_pos != pos);
>
> down(&inode->i_sem);
> - ret = generic_file_aio_write_nolock(iocb, &local_iov, 1,
> + ret = __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(iocb, &local_iov, 1,
> &iocb->ki_pos);
> up(&inode->i_sem);

--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@xxxxxxxxxx)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/