Re: [PATCH] swsusp: properly suspend and resume *all* devices

[Barry K. Nathan]

On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 07:33:18PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Ack. [I have similar patch in my tree, but yours is better in error
> > checking area. Please push it to akpm.]
> 
> Actually you missed second half: same code should be added around
> swsusp_arch_resume. It is not too critical there, but its right thing
> to do.

Hmmm... I'm not sure how necessary it is, and I think it slows down
resume a tiny bit. However, the more I think about it the more correct it
seems, so here's the follow-up patch. (Andrew, even if this patch is
rejected, please commit my first one to the next -mm release. That patch
alone is still an improvement over the current code.)

Signed-off-by: Barry K. Nathan <barryn@xxxxxxxxx>

--- linux-2.6.10-mm1-bkn3/kernel/power/swsusp.c	2005-01-03 06:27:07.753344731 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.10-mm1-bkn4/kernel/power/swsusp.c	2005-01-03 20:19:06.737439106 -0800
@@ -878,6 +878,7 @@
 {
 	int error;
 	local_irq_disable();
+	device_power_down(PM_SUSPEND_DISK);
 	/* We'll ignore saved state, but this gets preempt count (etc) right */
 	save_processor_state();
 	error = swsusp_arch_resume();
@@ -887,6 +888,7 @@
 	BUG_ON(!error);
 	restore_processor_state();
 	restore_highmem();
+	device_power_up();
 	local_irq_enable();
 	return error;
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/