Re: starting with 2.7

[Jeff V. Merkey]

Alan Cox wrote:

> It isn't a good assumption that rate of change drives rate of errors and
> need for testing. It is one factor but the amount of review, the
> modularity of the code and the effectiveness of the management and
> verification tools are all involved greatly.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>  
Rate of change X 3 = Rate of testing.

Seems to apply in commerical software development, provided the testing 
engineers are brighter than
the developers (which in most cases they need to be).

:-)

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/