Re: [PATCH][1/2] adjust dirty threshold for lowmem-only mappings

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 07:07:21PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> The problem as posed is that the dirty memory limits are global, but

What do you mean with global? Global is one thing, but taking highmem
into account for calculating the limit is another thing. The
nr_free_buffer_pages exists exactly to avoid taking highmem into account
for the dirty memory limits. 2.6 must also ignore highmem in the dirty
memory limits like 2.4 does. I'd be surprised if somebody broke this in
2.6. As far as I can tell, while writing to a blkdev it cannot make any
difference if you've 4G or 1G of ram because of that (I mean on x86 of
course).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/