Re: PATCH: 2.6.10 - Misrouted IRQ recovery for review

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> Ported to the new kernel/irq code.

Perhaps some Documentation/ patch would be nice?

I always thought manually polling interrupt handlers might be usefull,
and it indeed was very usefull on philips velo 1...
								Pavel

> +static int __init irqfixup_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +	irqfixup = 1;
> +	printk(KERN_WARNING "Misrouted IRQ fixup support enabled.\n");
> +	printk(KERN_WARNING "This may impact system performance.\n");
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +__setup("irqfixup", irqfixup_setup);
> +
> +static int __init irqpoll_setup(char *str)
> +{
> +	irqfixup = 2;
> +	printk(KERN_WARNING "Misrouted IRQ fixup and polling support enabled.\n");
> +	printk(KERN_WARNING "This may significantly impact system performance.\n");
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +__setup("irqpoll", irqpoll_setup);
> 

-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/