Re: Latency results with 2.6.10 - looks good

[Andrew Morton]

Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Followup: other audio users have confirmed that 2.6.10 is the best
>  release yet latency-wise.  It works most of the time at 64 frames
>  (~1.33ms latency).
> 
>  Now, the bad news: there are still enough xruns to make it not quite
>  good enough for, say, a recording studio; as we all know with realtime
>  constraints the worst case scenario is important.

The kernel which you should be testing is most-recent -mm.  The -mm kernels
have had a bunch of latency improvements which are queued for 2.6.11.  We
need to know how that stuff performs - 2.6.10 is largely uninteresting from
a development POV.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/