Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend onEMBEDDED

[Phil Dibowitz]

Matthew Dharm wrote:
> The best idea I have is to hide CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB behind
> CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.

As a long-term solution, this obviously won't work, but I think it's a 
_very_ good solution for now. UB _is_ expiramental at this point. It 
still has it's issues, and per Pete is still not to be used unless you 
really know what you're doing.

That makes it expiramental to me.

> The next-best idea I have is to make UB print out some sort of warning
> message at startup.
>
> Neither of these ideas is very good, I'll admit.

This is decent  idea. Some "Warning: UB enabled - your usb-storage 
devices may not work properly!" type thing on loading can't hurt.

Not the cleanest thing in the world, but look how well it worked for the 
unusual_devs cleanups.

--
Phil Dibowitz                             phil@xxxxxxxx
Freeware and Technical Pages              Insanity Palace of Metallica
http://www.phildev.net/                   http://www.ipom.com/

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
 - Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature