Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on EMBEDDED

[Pete Zaitcev]

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 01:16:44 +0100, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is there except for kernel size any good reason for using BLK_DEV_UB 
> instead of USB_STORAGE?

It depends. I like it.

>  config BLK_DEV_UB
>  	tristate "Low Performance USB Block driver"
> -	depends on USB
> +	depends on USB && EMBEDDED

The ub has nothing to do with embedded systems, most of which do not run
with CONFIG_EMBEDDED, BTW.

-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/