Re: [PATCH] add legacy I/O and memory access routines to /proc/bus/pci API

From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Wed Dec 15 2004 - 18:18:01 EST


On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 1:03 pm, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2004 09:27 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > +write
> > + Legacy I/O port space reads and writes must also be to a file
> > + position >64k--the kernel will route them to the target device.
>
> Shouldn't that be < 64k based on the description of lseek?

Err.. yes

> > +lseek
> > + Can be used to set the current file position. Note that the file
> > + size is limited to 64k as that's how big legacy I/O space is.
> >
> > +ioctl
> > + Note that not all architectures support the *_MMAP_* or *_RW_* ioctl
> > + commands. If they're not supported, ioctl will return -EINVAL.
>
> Shouldn't they return -ENOTTY? That indicates to the caller that the
> ioctl isn't handled, vs -EINVAL which indicates bad value being passed
> (e.g. bad write size).

Maybe, but that's not how /proc/bus/pci behaves right now...

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/