Re: dynamic-hz

From: Andrea Arcangeli
Date: Mon Dec 13 2004 - 08:06:52 EST


On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:01:42PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> believe the only real cost is the cacheline anyway.

[..] and in turn I guess by adding a second dynamic variable you just
doubled the only real cost ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/