[PATCH, RFC] protect call to set_tsk_need_resched() by the rq-lock

From: Michael Buesch
Date: Mon Dec 06 2004 - 18:22:16 EST


Hi,

The two attached patches (one against vanilla kernel and one
against ck patchset) moves the rq-lock a few lines up in
scheduler_tick() to also protect set_tsk_need_resched().

Is that neccessary?
If yes, please apply.

--
Regards Michael Buesch [ http://www.tuxsoft.de.vu ]


Index: linux-2.5/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/mb/develop/linux/rsync/linux-2.5/kernel/sched.c,v
retrieving revision 1.382
diff -u -p -r1.382 sched.c
--- linux-2.5/kernel/sched.c 19 Nov 2004 22:51:35 -0000 1.382
+++ linux-2.5/kernel/sched.c 6 Dec 2004 22:32:09 -0000
@@ -2318,12 +2318,12 @@ void scheduler_tick(int user_ticks, int
cpustat->user += user_ticks;
cpustat->system += sys_ticks;

+ spin_lock(&rq->lock);
/* Task might have expired already, but not scheduled off yet */
if (p->array != rq->active) {
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
- goto out;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
- spin_lock(&rq->lock);
/*
* The task was running during this tick - update the
* time slice counter. Note: we do not update a thread's
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-ck1-nozeroram/kernel/sched.c.orig 2004-12-05 01:55:08.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-ck1-nozeroram/kernel/sched.c 2004-12-06 23:27:41.000000000 +0100
@@ -2147,18 +2147,18 @@
cpustat->user += user_ticks;
cpustat->system += sys_ticks;

+ spin_lock(&rq->lock);
/* Task might have expired already, but not scheduled off yet */
if (unlikely(!task_queued(p))) {
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
- goto out;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
/*
* SCHED_FIFO tasks never run out of timeslice.
*/
if (unlikely(p->policy == SCHED_FIFO))
- goto out;
+ goto out_unlock;

- spin_lock(&rq->lock);
debit = ns_diff(rq->timestamp_last_tick, p->timestamp);
p->ns_debit += debit;
if (p->ns_debit < NSJIFFY)

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature