Re: cpufreq: shouldn't scaling_min_freq be lower?

[Matthew Garrett]

Thomas Bettler <bettlert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In the beginning there was a Windoze on it. The cpufreq varied from 1800 to 
> 120MHz

Windows tends to use a combination of CPU scaling and throttling to get
the processor that slow. Take a look at
/proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.linux-rutgers.kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/