Re: [PATCH 2.4.29-pre1] radeonfb: don't try to ioreamp the entireVRAM [was: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] why does radeonfb work fine in 2.6, butnot in 2.4.29-pre1?]

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Wed Dec 01 2004 - 11:26:51 EST


On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Kronos wrote:
> Il Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:46:06PM +0100, Jurriaan ha scritto:
> > The same radeonfb-setup works fine in every 2.6 kernel I can remember
> > (last tested with 2.6.10-rc2-mm3) but give the dreaded 'cannot map FB'
> > in 2.4.29-pre1.
> >
> > The card has 128 MB of ram, and my system has 3 GB of RAM.
> >
> > Is there any reason the ioremap() call works on 2.6, but doesn't on 2.4?
> >
> > I've tried searching google for hints, but nothing has turned up.
> >
> > Is there any way to test 2.4 with my radeonfb and all of my memory?
>
> I sent you a patch a while ago but was discarded because introduced a
> subtle API change. This time should be ok :)
>
> Make fb layer aware of the difference between the ioremap()'ed VRAM and
> total available VRAM.
> smem_len in struct fb_fix_screeninfo still contains the amount of
> physical VRAM (reported to userspace via FBIOGET_FSCREENINFO ioctl) and
> the new field mapped_vram contains the amount of VRAM actually
> ioremap()'ed by drivers (used in read/write/mmap operations).
> Since there was unused padding at the end of struct fb_fix_screeninfo
> binary compatibility with userspace utilities is retained.
> If mapped_vram is not set it's assumed that the entire framebuffer is
> mapped, thus other drivers are unaffected by this patch.
>
> The patch has been tested by Jurriaan <thunder7@xxxxxxxxx>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti <kronos@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> --- a/include/linux/fb.h 2004-11-30 18:30:08.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/include/linux/fb.h 2004-11-30 18:33:00.000000000 +0100
> @@ -126,7 +126,8 @@
> /* (physical address) */
> __u32 mmio_len; /* Length of Memory Mapped I/O */
> __u32 accel; /* Type of acceleration available */
> - __u16 reserved[3]; /* Reserved for future compatibility */
> + __u32 mapped_vram; /* Amount of ioremap()'ed VRAM */
> + __u16 reserved[1]; /* Reserved for future compatibility */
> };

I don't really like this patch. mapped_vram doesn't matter for user space at
all, so it does not belong to fb_fix_screeninfo.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/