Re: [PATCH] pci-mmconfig fix for 2.6.9

[Grant Grundler]

On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:22:50AM -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> > If I got the discussion so far correctly then the PCI-SGI spec does not
> > guarantee that there is no posting, but you know that the chipset
> > you are using right now doesn't do it.
> 
> Yes, that's my understanding of the spec. Grant Grundler does not agree
>  and thinks that non-posting is the only compliant implementation.

That's not what I said. I think we do agree. I'll rephrase.
The code currently in arch/i386 and arch/x86_64 support a chipset that
is compliant with the part of the spec that requires non-postable
config writes.

Other chipsets can implement postable config space. To be compliant
with the ECN, the architecture must define a method to guarantee
the posted writes have reached the target device. I think the
ECN we've been talking about assumes that method will be implemented
in firmware somehow and NOT as a direct access method in the OS.

> I wish he was right as it would be the easiest to deal with.
> We contacted Intel about the out-of-spec readl when writing to
> the PMCSR to change power state as they were the original author
> of the mmconfig code. Their solution was to remove the readl after
> confirming that mmconfig was non-posted on their chipsets.

That means someone has to introduce a new method to access
mmconfig if they implement postable writes.

hth,
grant
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/