Re: [PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.10-rc1

From: Russell King
Date: Sun Nov 07 2004 - 10:30:00 EST


On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 10:32:29PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:57:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > This patch fixes the problem by using a separate semaphore, called
> > dpm_list_sem, to cover the places where we need the device pm lists to be
> > stable, and by being careful about how we traverse the lists on suspend and
> > resume. I have analysed the various cases that can occur and I am
> > confident that I have handled them all correctly. I posted this patch
> > together with a detailed analysis 10 days ago.
>
> Does this mean that a device driver can have its suspend or resume
> methods called in the middle of a probe or remove on a different CPU ?
> (note: x86 APM does not freeze all processes last time I checked...)
>
> If yes, has anyone audited the drivers to ensure that they're correct
> in respect of this?

I'll repost the above question since it's of fundamental importance.

Thanks.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/